The stability principle in physics of non-inertial reference frames
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5067-2025-2-19-26
Abstract
Aim is to demonstrate that the principle of least action follows from the stability requirement. This means that it is possible to obtain fundamental laws of physics from stability, since they are derived from the principle of least action.
Methodology. A variational principle is considered which generalizes the classical principle of least action to any reference frames, including random non-inertial ones, and requires not only the first variation of the action function to be zero, but also the second variation of the action function to be non-negative.
Results. The principle of least action can be used to obtain the main fundamental laws of physics, therefore it can be argued that they follow from the stability requirement.
Research implications. The significance of the study lies in the fact that the axiomatic introduction of the stability principle leads to the axiomatics of mechanics, electrodynamics and other areas of physics.
Supporting agencies: The author is grateful to Professor V. V. Belyaev for valuable discussions and interest in this work.
About the Author
T. F. Kamalov
https://timkamalov.theorphys.org/
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Timur F. Kamalov – Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Fundamental Physics and Nanotechnology
Moscow
References
1. Kamalov, T. F. (2022). Stability principle. In: Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Physics and Mathematics, 2, 51–55. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7251-2022-2-51-55 (in Russ.).
2. Chetaev, N. G. (1931). On stable trajectories of dynamics. In: Scientific Notes of Kazan University, 91 (4), 3–8 (in Russ.).
3. Woodard, R. P. (2007). Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity. In: Papantonopoulos, L. ed. The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Berlin: Springer, pp. 403–433 (Series: Lecture Notes in Physics, 720). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71013-4_14.
4. Wheeler, J. T. (2005). Not-so-classical mechanics: unexpected symmetries of classical motion. In: Canadian Journal of Physics, 83 (2), 91–138. DOI: 10.1139/p05-003.
5. El-Nabulsi, R. A. (2014). Non-Standard Non-Local-in-Time Lagrangians in Classical Mechanics. In: Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems, 13, 149–160. DOI: 10.1007/s12346-014-0110-3.
6. Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London: Jussu Societatis Regiae ac typis Josephi Streater. Prostat apud plures bibliopolas.
7. Kamalov, T. F. (2020). Quantum correction for Newton's Law of Motion. In: Symmetry, 12 (1), article no. 63. DOI: 10.3390/sym12010063.
8. Kamalov, T. F. (2020). Quantum extension for Newton's law of motion. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1251, 012022. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1251/1/012022.
9. Kamalov, T. F. (2018). Instability states and Ostrogradsky formalism. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1051, 012033. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1051/1/012033.
10. Kamalov, T. F. (2020). Instability Criterion and Uncertainty Relation. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1557, 012003. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1557/1/012003.
11. Kamalov, T. F. (2010). Physics of Non-Inertial Reference Frames. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 1316 (1), 455–459. DOI: 10.1063/1.3536452.
12. Kamalov, T. F. & Kamalov, Yu. T. (2025). Physics of Non-Inertial Reference Frames, conclusions and consequences. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3017, 012020. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/3017/1/012020.
Supplementary files
Review
Views:
4
Email this article 